Running with shoes was a trend which commenced around 10 years ago and lasted a couple of years. The idea became really popular but faded away equally as fast as it came up. It was according to the principle that running shoes are certainly not good for you and that running without them is much more natural and more effective for runners. There have been a lot of books published about this, a great deal of websites promoting the promises and plenty of social media activity declaring the assumed advantages. Nevertheless, what happened is the fact that the positive aspects that were presumed for this never materialized for virtually all runners which took it up and there was a very high injury rate in runners who took it up. Athletes soon went back to what they were experienced with and all the guru’s who started out endorsing it are no longer heard from.
There was never any data that barefoot running was actually any better. It turned out to be mostly made up promises depending on anecdotes. When the research got carried out it established that the many promises that got made up for this were exactly that, made up. The benefits over using running shoes are just not there. Barefoot running is only different to running in shoes. Ever since the barefoot fad died off, there was clearly a changeover to far more highly cushioned shoes. This was the opposite to the craze of barefoot and it too got called a fad. Except, at this time you won't notice any indication of that trend to the high cushioned running shoes dropping off, so it will be in all probability pretty sure that it is not simply a fad but a long lasting trend. Running barefoot or with conventional running shoes or with optimum cushioned running shoes are simply just different. One is not better than the other and individual runners may have their own inclinations in regards to what they prefer to run in which is okay.
The choice that a runner may make as to what running shoes to wear could possibly be important. Getting the athletic shoes right has implications for how fast the athlete runs and could very well affect the chance for a running injury. You will find, however, experts who do don't agree with that and there is definitely plenty of discourse in regards to the concerns. There is some proof to support both position of this debate, but not much consensus and it relies on the method that you desire to spin the data concerning which side of the discussion that you want to believe in. The podiatry linked live chat via Facebook, PodChatLive a short while ago talked about this issue by talking to Dr Chris Napier, Physiotherapist as well as Associate Professor from the University of British Columbia (and 2:30 marathoner). PodChatLive is a regular chat that goes out live on Facebook and then published to YouTube following the live chat.
Throughout this episode on athletic shoes, Chris summarised his recent British Journal of Sports Medicine paper that was around the logical myths in the running footwear debate. The PodChatLive hosts and Chris spoke of how runners (both uninjured and injured) should choose athletic shoes. They outlined precisely what the research really does actually tells us and just what it doesn’t yet tell us. They also talked about just how much emphasis and attention athletic shoes seems to get and asked, is it basically about comfort? Chris Napier is a Clinical Assistant Professor from the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of British Columbia as well as an associate member of the Centre for Hip Health and Mobility. Chris Napier initially got his his Master of Physiotherapy degree in Perth in Australia, in 2003, and then his PhD at the UBC in 2018 on running biomechanics and injury. Since becoming a physiotherapist, Chris has specialised his training with postgrad research in manual therapy and also sport physiotherapy.